top of page
Search

23. Is IQ Destiny? The Science Behind Intelligence and Jobs

Updated: Jun 21


There are generally two schools of thought when it comes to intelligence:


Nature (genetics) vs. Nurture (education & environment)


Most experts agree that education matters a great deal, but research also shows that your genetic predisposition (natural tendancy) plays a surprisingly large role. In fact, for certain cognitive domains, genetics might even outweigh environment.


But don’t worry, this blog post isn’t about being deterministic. If you remember from our previous class (Week 23), we discussed how intelligence is multi-faceted (diverse). We watched a video explaining how IQ isn’t everything. There are 5 different types of intelligence:


  • 🗣️ Verbal

  • 🧩 Visual-spatial

  • 🧮 Quantitative

  • 🧬 General reasoning

  • 🧠 Cognitive speed and memory


And as that video (timestamped 13:25) explained, your gender, race, or age stereotypes can actually affect test performance, a phenomenon known as Stereotype Threat (Steele & Aronson, 1995).



Jordan Peterson on IQ and the Job Market


One of the more controversial yet fascinating ideas we explored comes from Dr. Jordan Peterson, a clinical psychologist and former professor at the University of Toronto (and formerly Harvard). In his lecture “IQ and the Job Market” (timestamp 1:18), he suggests that IQ is a statistically reliable predictor of where people tend to land on the job complexity ladder.


BUT❗ IQ does not predict life success. According to Peterson, two other factors matter even more:


1. Stress Tolerance: Your ability to function under pressure.

2. Conscientiousness: Your capacity to stay organized, disciplined, and focused.


Let’s take a closer look at how IQ ranges tend to correspond with job types, based on research and Peterson’s summary:



📊 IQ-Based Job Complexity Tiers


🔻 IQ 80~89


Tier: Low-Complexity Roles (Below 25th Percentile)


Typical Roles:

  • 🧹 Janitorial Staff

  • 📦 Warehouse Laborers

  • 🌿 Landscaping Workers

  • 🏭 Assembly Line Operators

  • 🍳 Food Prep Assistants



🔹 IQ 90~99


Tier: Lower-Mid Complexity Roles (25th~50th Percentile)


Typical Roles:

  • 🛠 Machine Operators

  • 🚚 Delivery Drivers

  • 🛒 Retail Clerks

  • 🧱 Construction Workers

  • 🍔 Food Service Workers


🔸 IQ 100~109


Tier: Mid-Complexity Roles (50th~75th Percentile)


Typical Roles:

  • 🗂 Administrative Assistants

  • 📞 Customer Service Representatives

  • 💼 Sales Associates

  • 🚓 Police Officers

  • 🔧 Skilled Tradespeople (Electricians, Plumbers)


🟨 IQ 110~119


Tier: Upper-Mid Complexity Roles (75th~90th Percentile)


Typical Roles:

  • 💻 Software Developers

  • 🧮 Accountants & Financial Analysts

  • 🧪 Engineers (Various Fields)

  • 🏥 Registered Nurses

  • 📚 High School Teachers


🟩 IQ 120~130


Tier: High-Complexity Roles (Top 10%)


Typical Roles:

  • 🧠 Physicists, Mathematicians

  • 🩺 Surgeons, Medical Specialists

  • 🎓 University Professors

  • ⚖️ Patent Attorneys, Legal Scholars

  • 🤖 AI Researchers, Data Scientists


🟦 IQ 131~145


Tier: Very High Complexity Roles (Top 2%~0.1% / Mensa Range)


Typical Roles:

  • 🌌 Theoretical Physicist

  • 🔍 Philosopher, Logician, Epistemologist

  • 🛰 Intelligence Analyst, National Security Strategist

  • 🧠 Neurosurgeon, Specialized Medical Expert

  • 🧾 Policy Architect, Think Tank Fellow

  • 🧱 Senior Software/System Architect


🟪 IQ 145~159


Tier: Highly Gifted (~0.1% of Population)


Cognitive Traits:

  • Rapid abstract pattern recognition

  • Accelerated learning (5~10x faster than a normal person)

  • Broad conceptual synthesis across disciplines

Typical Roles:

  • 🤖 AI Researcher

  • 🧠 Neurosurgeon

  • 📊 Systems Theorist

  • 🎮 Conceptual Game Designer

  • 🎓 Elite University Professor


🟥 IQ 160~179


Tier: Profoundly Gifted (~0.01% of Population)


Cognitive Traits:

  • Original domain creation (paradigm shifting)

  • Sparse-data multivariate reasoning

  • Exceptional symbolic memory and problem-solving

Typical Roles:

  • 🧪 Nobel-level Scientists

  • 🔐 Cryptographic Architects

  • 🧠 Inventors of Theoretical Systems

  • ♟ Strategic Masters (e.g., Go champions, futurists)



But Here's the Catch...


While IQ can help predict what level of complexity you might be comfortable working in, it doesn't determine success. Many brilliant people burn out because they lack resilience or discipline.


As Peterson puts it:

"High intelligence won’t save you if you can’t handle stress or follow through."

So ultimately, your life outcome is best predicted by:✅ IQ + ✅ Stress Tolerance + ✅ Conscientiousness



📝 Homework: Test Yourself


Take the Mensa IQ Challenge — a valid sample IQ test (35 questions in 25 minutes).



P.S — If you are serious about getting a clearer estimate of your IQ, try the RIOT IQ Test. It is one of the closer online alternatives to the actual WAIS, or Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, and it feels more structured, valid, and reliable than typical online IQ quizzes.

In the comments section below, do one of the following:


Option 1: Reflect

  • Share your result (optional)

  • What tier does it place you in?

  • Do the job dispersion categories match with your actual interests or strengths?


Option 2: Challenge the Idea

  • Do you agree or disagree that IQ is a good predictor of future jobs?

  • What other traits could completely change someone’s future path?

  • Could a person with an average IQ outperform a person with a high IQ?

 
 
 

51 Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating

So what I got was 142. NO!!! I wanted to get over 150. Actually, when I took an IQ test somewhere before, I got over 130. I found out that when you get older, your IQ falls!!!

:( (It didn’t come as a big shock to me. ^^)


I’m in the blue tier (131–145). I don’t like any of those jobs because they’re BORING. (What’s a Think Tank Fellow anyway? Weird name.) If I had gotten at least one more question right, I would have been able to be a game designer!!! Ahhhh!!! I don’t wanna be a Think Tank Fellow!!!


But I think being a proprietary trader might be good, though. It pays 35,000,000–60,000,000 won per year! I have…

Like

Rated 5 out of 5 stars.

I disagree that I.Q is a good predictor of future jobs. If you just have passion and confidence, you can easily outperform a person with a higher I.Q. It is also important to maintain your mental health. Nothing matters if you just end up committing suicide in the end due to your poor processing of stress.

Like

Doyun Min
Doyun Min
Jun 23

So. I got a decent score of 128. However, I try to think that many people are suitable for many jobs outside their IQ. Also, I took a real test and I got a 134. This puts to show that the results may not always be exact.

Like


My IQ was measured to be 145 or more. I was proud of myself for getting an IQ of 145 or more, and that put me in the tier of 'Highly Gifted'. I was in the top 0.1%, which suggested these jobs:

  • 🤖 AI Researcher

  • 🧠 Neurosurgeon

  • 📊 Systems Theorist

  • 🎮 Conceptual Game Designer

  • 🎓 Elite University Professor

    I personally wanted to become an Elite University Professor, so I believe that Mensa suggested a good job for me. I hope I can get smarter to actually get into Mensa!!! I thought that an IQ of 145 was pretty high, so I'll try to stick to this until I can finally go into Mensa. (P.S. My lifelong dream ISN'T going into…

Like

HHYPE
HHYPE
Jun 22
Rated 5 out of 5 stars.

OK WHY IS THE QUALITY OF THE SCREENSHOT LIKE THAT??


ok so I'm not really sure how I got this high of a score. I think It's bc i guessed the last 3 questions well. Anyways i don't really like the jobs Mensa gave me. This is mostly because I wanted a stocks trader. Sadly this test wasn't that exiting so i almost dozed off. I also kinda respect Leo.Ha because he got 131 on his first try. (i got 125 on my first, but I wasn't that satisfied because i took it with my friend, and they got 131). Anyways I guess this test was interesting, but the patterns for most of the questions were matching. the last 6…

Edited
Like
bottom of page